NEWS
|
|
Wed, 09 Aug 2006 |
|
DENIS THE MENACE It has come to my attention that many medical
schemes are providing a poor package of dental
benefits to their clients, which even falls short
of the public sector provision of services
regarding basic dentistry for all people in South
Africa. The minimum basic services for the public
sector as prescribed by the Hon. Mantoshabalala
Msimang – Minister of Health, in the White Paper
on the transformation of oral health care in
South Africa clearly describes a minimum basic
dental package that is in line with global
preventative measures regarding dental care where
individuals may have the provision of primary
dental care which include fillings, scaling and
polishing, dental x-rays and extractions as well
as the application of fluoride and preventative
agents .
“ a) Minimum package of oral health care
A defined minimum package of oral health care
should be provided to the priority groups listed
above. This package should consist of
examinations, bitewing radiographs, cleaning of
teeth, simple 1-3 surface fillings, fissure
sealants and emergency relief of pain and
infection control.
Oral diseases, especially dental caries and
periodontal diseases, are among the most common
diseases affecting South African society. More
than 90% of adults in South Africa suffer from
dental caries, and 93,5% from periodontal
diseases. It is worth noting that oral diseases
are increasing among major sections of the
population, especially the disadvantaged and
urbanized groups.”
Excerpt - White Paper for the Transformation of
the Health System in South Africa Department of
Health April 1997
I must commend the minister in taking such a step
toward the fight against the two most prevalent
conditions in our country, dental caries (+-92%)
and periodontal disease (+-95%), by adequately
providing these services that are direly needed
by all South Africans to ensure good oral
health .As dental practitioners in the country,
it is becoming frustrating in dealing with the
vast playing fields that are being created by
schemes with no consideration for the primary
dental care needs of their members ( our
patients ) . Each scheme seems to ignore the
industry standards that were initially set out by
the Board of Healthcare Funders and are on a
quest to minimize patient benefits in order to
maximize profitability or sustainability of the
scheme itself. Basic Conservative Dentistry is
not an auxiliary service, it is a basic health
right of all South Africans which must be made
part of the prescribed minimum benefit (PMB)for
all patients.
If the state can afford to provide these basic
dental services for South Africans, surely the
private sector should be able to for their
members, who may, as a result of the current
systems, become a burden to the public health
sector – these schemes then become a
contradiction to private healthcare and their
existence.
Our second and principal concern however, is the
blatant discrimination of our profession in terms
of benefit structure allocation.
The blatant expulsion of Dental Therapists from
the consultative process, web site, information
brochures, benefit guides, smile programme,
dental literature and every other activity at
DENIS (dental information systems) and associated
schemes, shows disrespect of the profession as
well as autonomous decision making by executives
and advisors at DENIS that are wholly dentist
managed and owned – there is no representation of
Dental Therapy, no consultation with our
association or notification of guidelines for
Dental Therapists. DENTASA – Dental Therapists
Association of South Africa, on behalf of all
dental therapists would not tolerate such obvious
and bold dictatorship from DENIS. As an example
DENIS pays dentists twice the NRPL consultation
rate whilst excluding, limiting and reducing NRPL
rates for Dental Therapists. Dentists
are “allowed” to perform fillings per patient
without limitations whilst Dental Therapists may
not do more than three fillings for a patient and
not more than ten per year for a family. It is
quite apparent that DENIS is looking after the
economic interests of Dentists at the expense of
benefit allocations to Dental Therapists and our
patients.
This sort of unethical business practice is
undesirable and constitutes professional
discrimination to which DENIS and the schemes
associated are liable and accountable.
The conservative dental category is a scope that
spans both professions. It is unethical for DENIS
to choose which profession to grant more freedoms
to practice whilst limiting another. Our
patients, and not a dental administrator, must
make the decision on whom to visit for
conservative dental treatment. This
anticompetitive behaviour is in contravention of
the competitions council and constitutes unfair
and unethical business practice. Both a dentist
and dental therapist are able to perform the same
end result and function in conservative
dentistry.
(SCALING & POLISHING, XRAYS, RESTORATIONS,
EXTRACTIONS ETC.)
It is a routine with DENIS that a Dental
Therapist must submit x-rays for every patient
since every patient needs motivation, this does
not apply to Dentists. Yet our requests are never
taken seriously with 80% of them being denied
procedures, for essential fillings to save
teeth. Denis excludes vital codes for the
practice of Dental Therapy such as the provision
of sterilised instruments (are we to use
unsterile) , indirect pulp therapies, three or
more surface restorations, abcess drainage, oral
health instructions and others … - these vital
procedures are excluded for Dental Therapists, as
a result our patients are either not charged for
(provided free to patients) or patients then have
to pay for these exclusions. As a result of this
discrimination many of our patients are visiting
Dentists where their bills are promptly settle by
Denis.
We have requested a set of rules in writing from
DENIS on several occasions but were denied this,
as they do not give such information in writing.
We have also tried on several occasions to speak
to the dental advisor whom the operators inform
is Dr. Dunn as well as addressed these concerns
to the executive directors (Dr Gareth Hayton) but
these individuals refuse to take our & our
members calls. Moreover, numerous formal requests
to engage DENTASA in resolving the matter has
fallen on deaf ears – copies of correspondence
sent to DENIS – EXECUTIVE is attached.
DENTASA on behalf of its members hereby submit
that:-
1) In terms of section 61 of the Act, the
Registrar has the ability, with the concurrence
of the Council and the Minister, to declare a
business practice as undesirable for all or a
particular category of medical schemes, or all or
a particular category of persons who render
contractual, administrative or intermediary
services.
2) It is undesirable to discriminate between
the providers of health care services on an
arbitrary and contrived basis, and to limit a
patient’s freedom of choice in respect of his or
her preferred health care provider.
3) It is undesirable to permit the
perpetuation of a practice, which artificially
and unjustifiably manipulates the market for
health care services, where no rational
explanation exists in order to justify either the
distinction or the prejudice caused to both
Dental Therapists and their patients.
Medical Schemes Act, Act No. 131 of 1998 (“the
Act”).
Furthermore the schemes / Denis advises our
patients to see dentists as their accounts would
then be settled as dentists can do more for them
as per the discriminatory regulations set out by
DENIS. This discrimination as well as unethical
behaviour of DENIS needs to be addressed as we as
Dental Therapists in South Africa feel
prejudiced. The Dentist to Dental Therapist ratio
in SA is 10:1.
This discrimination, that is negatively impacting
our business as private practitioners is not
tolerated and is regarded as an unfair business
practice by the competitions council. Dental
Therapists are wholly black practitioners that
are being discriminated against by a majority
white controlled DENIS and other schemes, from
our inquiries we found only one black executive
member who is a clinical auditor in the executive
at DENIS.
This sort of discrimination is clearly against
policies for black economic empowerment as it
places black Dental Therapists in an
anticompetitive environment through market
controlled tactics by medical schemes. Most
Dental Therapists currently service rural and
outlaying regions that Dentists seem to ignore,
as they are mostly located in lucrative dense
urban regions. The aggressive limitations poised
by DENIS and schemes against Dental Therapists
are ultimately relating to a disparity in
benefits for majority of black patients in rural
areas that are mostly affected. This racial
demography is characteristic of historical
Apartheid. We as Dental Therapists must provide
our patients with quality and service they come
to expect and simply cannot ensure our business
survival through such blatant and compromising
pricing structures promulgated by DENIS and
associated schemes.
Whilst we are faced with such irritate
discrimination and oppression from your scheme,
we must state that no other scheme in the country
has these discriminatory attitudes to our
profession.
We hereby call on the executive board at your
scheme to;
1. Supply reasons why discrimination exists for
Dental Therapists
2. Put an end to professional discrimination
and anti-constitutional corporate behaviour
3. To comply with the medical schemes council,
bhf and competitions council rules and
regulations regarding ethical business operations
and anti discriminatory regulations.
4. Engage DENTASA on consultation and
involvement in the pricing/ regulation process.
6. Representation at DENIS and your scheme as a
stakeholder profession & clinical advisors in
dentistry for Dental Therapy.
7. Observe the Dental Therapy profession as a
sovereign profession – not a “stepchild” of
DENTISTRY and Dentists.
8. To settle our accounts timeously and end the
professional bigotry.
Should you wish to engage in further deliberation
regarding this issue, Feel free to contact
DENTASA by email - denticare@vodamail.co.za.
Yours for Equality in Dentistry
Lesley Sebastian Naidoo
(B.Dent.Th), (Pg.Dip.Pub.Adm.) (MBA)
Dental Therapist
Chairman
DENTASA
Po box 561646 Chatsworth 4030 KZN
denticare@vodamail.co.za
telefax: 031 - 7085797
Posted 15:06
|
|
6 comments |
|
test feedback hello are there any dental therapists that are alive in this country out there -...... wake up and say sumthing ... its gettin kinda lonely out here ... Posted by lesley
|
|
truth i look to the day this will be corrected. thank sebs. Posted by kam
|
|
brilliant hi i am a therapist in private practice for a while now and am very impressed by lesley's take on the situation...i have just submitted my reg form and are proud of you guy's for doing sterling work..i have beentotally in the dark for the last few years and can't wait to be on board..let's not be apologetic for our profession and lets stand together and empower ourselve's Posted by muhammed arshad khan
|
|
Hallo Hi, It's all good and well to put grievance on paper and hope for a positive outcome. But we have been barking up this tree for so long now, with no result. It's time to bite back!! Posted by John le Roux
|
|
Misleading Although there are some parts in your argument that is worth believing your case is build on some wild statements. The statistics you are using are grossly misleading. The last proprer study (done in 1988) showed caries prevalence much less than what you say and the prevalence of severe periodontal disease will be far less than 10%. Posted by Thomas Postma
|
|
CORRECTION WILD STATEMENTS one thhing is for sure : dental caires and perio disease is the two most pressing oro dental factors that affect humanity - be advised these quotes are from our national statistics as quoted by the white paper on policy reforms (1997) Posted by LESLEY
|
|
Post a Comment: |

